Friday, June 12, 2009
The lighter side of C-Span...O-Span....whatever
This is very indicative of a lot of the public speeches and hearings of the U.S. Congress. Good times!
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Fickle Private Property
If you or anyone you know owns property, watching this five minute video is worthwhile.
Unimaginably Fast Computers
Today, new personal computers generally process information at a speed of 2 to 3 thousand calculations per second (2GHz and 3GHz).
The good ol' boys and girls at MIT are making strides towards processing speeds of one million calculations per second (1,000 GHz or 1THz (terraherz)).
Here's an article describing the technique.
The good ol' boys and girls at MIT are making strides towards processing speeds of one million calculations per second (1,000 GHz or 1THz (terraherz)).
Here's an article describing the technique.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Can San Diego become water-independent? Jim Bell thinks so.
This OB Rag Blog article is worth a quick peek.
Monday, March 2, 2009
Hilarious Monetary update
I love the line "No reasonable person is going to suggest we stop destroying money." Hilarious stuff.
Friday, February 20, 2009
Great Crap!
This is the kind of alternative fuel article I love to see.
It's a concept and technology that more and more small farming operations are adopting. Methane from animal crap and ethanol from switch grass (as opposed to ethanol from corn) and the like are such promising resources that cannot be ignored by the US for much longer simply because of the greater and greater ease of accessibility and cost effectiveness.
The article I linked to at the start of this blog indicates an equivalent production cost per gallon of ethanol in the US between $2 and $3. For those who are not clear on the misleading nature of this statistic, check out Brazil compared to the US and note that not only is the US government subsidizing the US corn-ethanol industry but it's also imposing a pretty hefty tariff per gallon on imported ethanol.
The most common misconception in America in terms of ethanol production is that corn is where the US should maintain its focus for this type of fuel generation. Know that although the US is not an ideal place for growing sugar cane it (along with pretty much every other less-than-arid area) is capable of growing copious amounts of switch grass which, unlike corn, has %100 of the plant used in the generation of ethanol and not just the "fruit." Also, switch grass actively extracts CO2 from the air and pumps it into the soil making for more fertile soil. Corn, on the other hand, needs a lot of fertilizers to help it grow. Switch grass yield per square acre (or hectare...whatever area you measure out in your country...) are double that of corn and, again I'll say, %100 percent of the plant is used to make ethanol.
There are several videos , videos, videos, you can check out that talk about the merits of grass-based ethanol vs. corn ethanol.
It's a concept and technology that more and more small farming operations are adopting. Methane from animal crap and ethanol from switch grass (as opposed to ethanol from corn) and the like are such promising resources that cannot be ignored by the US for much longer simply because of the greater and greater ease of accessibility and cost effectiveness.
The article I linked to at the start of this blog indicates an equivalent production cost per gallon of ethanol in the US between $2 and $3. For those who are not clear on the misleading nature of this statistic, check out Brazil compared to the US and note that not only is the US government subsidizing the US corn-ethanol industry but it's also imposing a pretty hefty tariff per gallon on imported ethanol.
The most common misconception in America in terms of ethanol production is that corn is where the US should maintain its focus for this type of fuel generation. Know that although the US is not an ideal place for growing sugar cane it (along with pretty much every other less-than-arid area) is capable of growing copious amounts of switch grass which, unlike corn, has %100 of the plant used in the generation of ethanol and not just the "fruit." Also, switch grass actively extracts CO2 from the air and pumps it into the soil making for more fertile soil. Corn, on the other hand, needs a lot of fertilizers to help it grow. Switch grass yield per square acre (or hectare...whatever area you measure out in your country...) are double that of corn and, again I'll say, %100 percent of the plant is used to make ethanol.
There are several videos , videos, videos, you can check out that talk about the merits of grass-based ethanol vs. corn ethanol.
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
New Technology We All Need
This is absolutely hilarious! I can't wait for the 800GB version!
This is EXACTLY what American consumers should go out and buy to stimulate the economy. ...and hilarity.
This is EXACTLY what American consumers should go out and buy to stimulate the economy. ...and hilarity.
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Issues of Great Importance
If you are not at one with The Flight of The Conchords then you are not aware of their tremendous contribution to key issues of our time, and indeed, future issues as well. I guess my point is they have issues and I love them for it.
Here's a clever presentation where they address key issues such as why we're still paying so much for shoes when child slave labor is so cheap.
Here's a clever presentation where they address key issues such as why we're still paying so much for shoes when child slave labor is so cheap.
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Credit in the USSA: United Socialist States of America
After I posted a comment on this blog I figured it would be a good idea to actually make a "Galt's Gulch".
Before I was aware of any of Ayn Rand's writings I was a proponent of minimal involvement in popular society in terms of credit (borrowing money) and government intervention in private matters (e.g. running a business).
In regards to credit, my thoughts at the time I was a teenager through my early twenties were partially driven by the seemingly vague requirements for being deemed Credit Worthy and whether such a "blessing" was worthwhile.
The most common points against my negative view on borrowed money were in favor of the big loans such as house, car and school. The arguments are such that without good credit it would be difficult if not impossible to qualify for loans for these big purchases.
For a short time I did jump into the credit game. I took a loan out for a car in addition to a loan for schooling. At one point I missed 3 consecutive months of student loan payments during a bout of unemployment and my credit score suffered. That was almost 10 years ago.
Since then I have actively tried to improve my credit score towards the end of qualifying for a home loan. I have been amazed at how difficult it has been to build good credit without taking out huge debts. I have been responsible and timely in the amount of money I borrow and when I pay it back. My method of operation has generally been one of saving money and then making the purchase. It turns out that my method is very uncommon and also unwelcome by those who dictate credit worthiness.
The three credit reporting companies apply virtually no worth to one's lack of outstanding debt in relation to one's net income. For almost three years I had less than $500 in total credit card debt and I was able to completely pay off my auto loan almost half the scheduled time. ...my credit score barely moved.
Cash flow and any surplus cash is not, and indeed cannot, be factored into your credit score based on the current rating system and information gathering used by Experian, Transunion or Equifax. How can this be the case? Isn't this an essential factor in considering someone's ability to cover a loan?
I went to a popular electronics store in early 2008 to buy a new TV. This may be an opportunity to expand my credit rating. The clerk offered a store credit card application. It had been a year or two since I tried expanding my credit so I gave it a shot. Denied in less than a minute. I paid for the TV in cash. Does anyone else see a problem with the credit system at this point?
If not, let me put it this way: Demonstrated fiscal responsibility is unimportant in the eyes of credit ratings.
Nowhere on my credit report will you see my 100% payment for a $1500 purchase. You will only see that I applied for credit and no new credit was added to my report. In other words, you will only see I was denied credit.
How does this relate to socialism?
My mother owns a house in Southern California's San Diego county. At a time when housing prices were skyrocketing and home loans along with home equity loans were abundant, I advised against taking out a new loan because of the risk of a drop off in prices. The long and short of it is she acted cautiously and responsibly. No new loans were taken out and now the housing market is in shambles.
Here is where I make the connection:
If she had taken out a new loan and been financially destroyed because of that risk, the political rhetoric of the day would apply to her. She would not be condemned for over-exposure to credit and volatile markets, in fact, quite the opposite. Emergency bailout money could be requested to "keep her in her home" that she can no longer afford at the inflated price now owed. Legislation to maintain a high price for her house would be considered. Good ol' price control. *sigh*
Fiscal responsibility is not considered important in America. In fact, it's quite the opposite. The vast majority of politicians act in favor of a Keynesian view of economics where the best thing to do for a healthy economy is spend. Saving is inherently counterproductive in this model and that's a key point and the reason a spending and/or stimulus package is considered essential in getting the country, and indeed the world, out of the current economic slump it is in.
Spending money without making more money (e.g. bailouts, bridge building, etc) means more money must be borrowed.
Soooo...the US government wants to spend money without raising taxes. Joy. More money to be borrowed from Japan, Saudi Arabia and China. They want to spend money to support the irresponsible credit habits of the government and its irresponsible citizens. If you are a responsible citizen you can't cash in on this attitude. Actually, you get burned. I get burned. My mother gets burned.
Those of us who would like to wait for reasonable prices for homes are out of luck. Sure, credit towards buying a home is getting more and more available, but even as housing prices fall there is the possibility of price fixing in the form of government guarantees on inflated housing loans.
So I'm saving my cash. I don't have a lot. I rent my home. I still purchase everything with cash. $800+ dollars in tires and various auto work last week. Cash. No credit. I'm not worthy of more and more and more credit. That's fine with me.
The dark viewpoint of the author of the Mises.org article I referenced at the beginning of this rant really got me thinking about optimism. There aren't many people who express a lot of optimism in any specific terms or details. The most common optimism is that Obama will bring about change. He won't. The propositions we see coming out of Washington D.C. are ideas that are proudly touted as FDR-esque or Lincoln-esque. That's old news. How about a change?
Change? hmm...here's something to try or at least consider:
Do not borrow money and credit to the point where life revolves around finances.
We won't see that kind of change. We'll see a repeat of the past and more blame passed around. The perceived reason for continued trouble in the economic world will be a lack of support for these "new-old" ideas and methods of borrowing and spending.
So again I have decided to pull out of the credit game. Cash and savings will be my concern. I'm not going to look at my credit score anytime soon. It's not like it's moved much anyway.
Galt's Gulch is a fictional place but there are people who have achieved a significant amount of that freedom in one way or another. I believe I'm on a good path to join them and drop out of this ludicrous game of clamoring for the status of Irresponsible Subservient to credit markets.
For myself, I think this may be the only sane solution until change comes. Obama (as Bush did before him) and the United Socialist States of America continue to support and even encourage the same behavior that culminated into an economic disaster of historic proportions. The names of the products purchased may differ slightly but it's all done with credit.
If anybody needs me I'll be in Eric's Gultch where the proper "change" is provided. Sorry, no credit.
Before I was aware of any of Ayn Rand's writings I was a proponent of minimal involvement in popular society in terms of credit (borrowing money) and government intervention in private matters (e.g. running a business).
In regards to credit, my thoughts at the time I was a teenager through my early twenties were partially driven by the seemingly vague requirements for being deemed Credit Worthy and whether such a "blessing" was worthwhile.
The most common points against my negative view on borrowed money were in favor of the big loans such as house, car and school. The arguments are such that without good credit it would be difficult if not impossible to qualify for loans for these big purchases.
For a short time I did jump into the credit game. I took a loan out for a car in addition to a loan for schooling. At one point I missed 3 consecutive months of student loan payments during a bout of unemployment and my credit score suffered. That was almost 10 years ago.
Since then I have actively tried to improve my credit score towards the end of qualifying for a home loan. I have been amazed at how difficult it has been to build good credit without taking out huge debts. I have been responsible and timely in the amount of money I borrow and when I pay it back. My method of operation has generally been one of saving money and then making the purchase. It turns out that my method is very uncommon and also unwelcome by those who dictate credit worthiness.
The three credit reporting companies apply virtually no worth to one's lack of outstanding debt in relation to one's net income. For almost three years I had less than $500 in total credit card debt and I was able to completely pay off my auto loan almost half the scheduled time. ...my credit score barely moved.
Cash flow and any surplus cash is not, and indeed cannot, be factored into your credit score based on the current rating system and information gathering used by Experian, Transunion or Equifax. How can this be the case? Isn't this an essential factor in considering someone's ability to cover a loan?
I went to a popular electronics store in early 2008 to buy a new TV. This may be an opportunity to expand my credit rating. The clerk offered a store credit card application. It had been a year or two since I tried expanding my credit so I gave it a shot. Denied in less than a minute. I paid for the TV in cash. Does anyone else see a problem with the credit system at this point?
If not, let me put it this way: Demonstrated fiscal responsibility is unimportant in the eyes of credit ratings.
Nowhere on my credit report will you see my 100% payment for a $1500 purchase. You will only see that I applied for credit and no new credit was added to my report. In other words, you will only see I was denied credit.
How does this relate to socialism?
My mother owns a house in Southern California's San Diego county. At a time when housing prices were skyrocketing and home loans along with home equity loans were abundant, I advised against taking out a new loan because of the risk of a drop off in prices. The long and short of it is she acted cautiously and responsibly. No new loans were taken out and now the housing market is in shambles.
Here is where I make the connection:
If she had taken out a new loan and been financially destroyed because of that risk, the political rhetoric of the day would apply to her. She would not be condemned for over-exposure to credit and volatile markets, in fact, quite the opposite. Emergency bailout money could be requested to "keep her in her home" that she can no longer afford at the inflated price now owed. Legislation to maintain a high price for her house would be considered. Good ol' price control. *sigh*
Fiscal responsibility is not considered important in America. In fact, it's quite the opposite. The vast majority of politicians act in favor of a Keynesian view of economics where the best thing to do for a healthy economy is spend. Saving is inherently counterproductive in this model and that's a key point and the reason a spending and/or stimulus package is considered essential in getting the country, and indeed the world, out of the current economic slump it is in.
Spending money without making more money (e.g. bailouts, bridge building, etc) means more money must be borrowed.
Soooo...the US government wants to spend money without raising taxes. Joy. More money to be borrowed from Japan, Saudi Arabia and China. They want to spend money to support the irresponsible credit habits of the government and its irresponsible citizens. If you are a responsible citizen you can't cash in on this attitude. Actually, you get burned. I get burned. My mother gets burned.
Those of us who would like to wait for reasonable prices for homes are out of luck. Sure, credit towards buying a home is getting more and more available, but even as housing prices fall there is the possibility of price fixing in the form of government guarantees on inflated housing loans.
So I'm saving my cash. I don't have a lot. I rent my home. I still purchase everything with cash. $800+ dollars in tires and various auto work last week. Cash. No credit. I'm not worthy of more and more and more credit. That's fine with me.
The dark viewpoint of the author of the Mises.org article I referenced at the beginning of this rant really got me thinking about optimism. There aren't many people who express a lot of optimism in any specific terms or details. The most common optimism is that Obama will bring about change. He won't. The propositions we see coming out of Washington D.C. are ideas that are proudly touted as FDR-esque or Lincoln-esque. That's old news. How about a change?
Change? hmm...here's something to try or at least consider:
Do not borrow money and credit to the point where life revolves around finances.
We won't see that kind of change. We'll see a repeat of the past and more blame passed around. The perceived reason for continued trouble in the economic world will be a lack of support for these "new-old" ideas and methods of borrowing and spending.
So again I have decided to pull out of the credit game. Cash and savings will be my concern. I'm not going to look at my credit score anytime soon. It's not like it's moved much anyway.
Galt's Gulch is a fictional place but there are people who have achieved a significant amount of that freedom in one way or another. I believe I'm on a good path to join them and drop out of this ludicrous game of clamoring for the status of Irresponsible Subservient to credit markets.
For myself, I think this may be the only sane solution until change comes. Obama (as Bush did before him) and the United Socialist States of America continue to support and even encourage the same behavior that culminated into an economic disaster of historic proportions. The names of the products purchased may differ slightly but it's all done with credit.
If anybody needs me I'll be in Eric's Gultch where the proper "change" is provided. Sorry, no credit.
Thursday, February 5, 2009
Disneyland Rare Facts
I love Disneyland and thought I was content to not go back for a long time. However, after reading the part in this post about Mickey being somewhere on EVERY ride, I think I'll have to go back soon to start looking for those Easter Eggs. Also, maybe I can join Club 33.
Sunday, February 1, 2009
A Warm Sea in the Arctic
Can you imagine global warming getting to the point where animals based in the tropics find the climate they need within the arctic circle? If not, you probably weren't around 90 million years ago.
Check out this discovery of a turtle fossil way up north.
Check out this discovery of a turtle fossil way up north.
A Random Picture Story
I was asked to post the the 6th picture of the 6th photo folder from my computer and to tell the story behind the picture (truth be told, in my 6th picture folder there is another set of folders so I took the 6th image from that folder to make a nice 6-6-6 pattern).
Here's the picture with the person's name and the company name removed to respect anonymity:
This is a plaque at the desk of an employee at a company I visited in Philadelphia. I snuck the picture because I didn't want to risk offense. If you offend the wrong person in the Corporate World it could result in Catbert-like results.
To me, the plaque is a hilarious example of corporate absurdity. This is an international manufacturing company with dozens of facilities world wide and yet they run a motivational program that is on par with one more often associated with grade-school than with companies worth hundreds of millions of dollars (I had a star driven motivational program in my Kindergarten and second grade classes. Maybe others but, thankfully, not that I can recall).
Note also that the system pictured was implemented in 2008! Just imagine the path of the conversation at that meeting of managers: "Yes, gold-star-sticker-plaque technology and its inherent motivational effects are something we've overlooked for far too long!"
This trip also just happened to be one of the last I took while working at Component Control. Good times and lots of travel!
That's my random pic story for now!
Here's the picture with the person's name and the company name removed to respect anonymity:
This is a plaque at the desk of an employee at a company I visited in Philadelphia. I snuck the picture because I didn't want to risk offense. If you offend the wrong person in the Corporate World it could result in Catbert-like results.
To me, the plaque is a hilarious example of corporate absurdity. This is an international manufacturing company with dozens of facilities world wide and yet they run a motivational program that is on par with one more often associated with grade-school than with companies worth hundreds of millions of dollars (I had a star driven motivational program in my Kindergarten and second grade classes. Maybe others but, thankfully, not that I can recall).
Note also that the system pictured was implemented in 2008! Just imagine the path of the conversation at that meeting of managers: "Yes, gold-star-sticker-plaque technology and its inherent motivational effects are something we've overlooked for far too long!"
This trip also just happened to be one of the last I took while working at Component Control. Good times and lots of travel!
That's my random pic story for now!
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Nuclear Power is now ready to be 99% cleaner
An awesome breakthrough in the treatment of nuclear waste thanks to the University of Texas - Austin. Check it out.
Friday, January 30, 2009
Mandatory Sterilization for Women...in The Netherlands????
There is a member of the Dutch Parliament who has proposed a mandatory review of women to be conducted every two years to determine whether she should be allowed to be sterilized for another two years or not.
Although most Americans would agree this is a blatant overstepping of government involvement in someone's personal privacy and rights, Mises.org blogger Briggs Armstrong outlines the case nicely in this post.
There is a series of videos at the bottom of the post that feature arguments from the MP who proposed the legislation along with counterpoints.
I'll finally mention that the MP who is proposing this legislation is a woman. I'm willing to put my money on the idea that she considers herself worthy to have children and will not be one of those chosen for sterilization.
Although most Americans would agree this is a blatant overstepping of government involvement in someone's personal privacy and rights, Mises.org blogger Briggs Armstrong outlines the case nicely in this post.
There is a series of videos at the bottom of the post that feature arguments from the MP who proposed the legislation along with counterpoints.
I'll finally mention that the MP who is proposing this legislation is a woman. I'm willing to put my money on the idea that she considers herself worthy to have children and will not be one of those chosen for sterilization.
Alcohol & Kids - The UK & USA legal differences
This is one of those things that you don't hear reported or mentioned often.
I've long argued that the legal drinking age in the United States should be decreased to 18 because that's the age at which it has been declared a person in the US is responsible enough to do everything else "adult". In this context the term "adult" can refer to anything from sex to voting to volunteering to join the military. It makes logical sense to deduce that someone who is capable of these actions should also be considered capable of responsible alcohol consumption. After all, they are old enough to get married and have children of their own which will have to be taught lessons of responsibility as well.
But the United States of America is morally confused on too many issues and "underage drinking" is just another one of those subjects.
...but not in the United Kingdom.
Check out this article about the legality of teenage drinking in the UK. The "hard line" point made in the article is that under no circumstances should someone under 15 drink alcohol.
So it' legal for "kids" in the United Kingdom to drink in pubs if they're over 15 (yes, fifteen) and having the drink with a purchasing adult.
It seems to me that denying a citizen of the United States of America the right to drink what they want is a shameful commentary of a double standard that can be experienced each time they go to a grocery store: You can legally buy over-the-counter medication with an alcohol percentage upwards of 25% (which is far above the 4.5 - 5.5% alcohol found in just about all popular beer) and containing drugs which can have significantly stronger effects than alcohol but you cannot buy a six pack of beer.
This policy of double-standards won't change soon, if it does change ever. The reason? There are no lobbyists working to end this simple injustice. Nope, the American Association of Young People (AAYP) doesn't exist so I guess the policies of the AARP (American Association of Retired People) will continue to be the dominant driver in US politics. ...joy.
(update: Thanks to Matt's comment which points out there IS an AAYP.)
I've long argued that the legal drinking age in the United States should be decreased to 18 because that's the age at which it has been declared a person in the US is responsible enough to do everything else "adult". In this context the term "adult" can refer to anything from sex to voting to volunteering to join the military. It makes logical sense to deduce that someone who is capable of these actions should also be considered capable of responsible alcohol consumption. After all, they are old enough to get married and have children of their own which will have to be taught lessons of responsibility as well.
But the United States of America is morally confused on too many issues and "underage drinking" is just another one of those subjects.
...but not in the United Kingdom.
Check out this article about the legality of teenage drinking in the UK. The "hard line" point made in the article is that under no circumstances should someone under 15 drink alcohol.
So it' legal for "kids" in the United Kingdom to drink in pubs if they're over 15 (yes, fifteen) and having the drink with a purchasing adult.
It seems to me that denying a citizen of the United States of America the right to drink what they want is a shameful commentary of a double standard that can be experienced each time they go to a grocery store: You can legally buy over-the-counter medication with an alcohol percentage upwards of 25% (which is far above the 4.5 - 5.5% alcohol found in just about all popular beer) and containing drugs which can have significantly stronger effects than alcohol but you cannot buy a six pack of beer.
This policy of double-standards won't change soon, if it does change ever. The reason? There are no lobbyists working to end this simple injustice. Nope, the American Association of Young People (AAYP) doesn't exist so I guess the policies of the AARP (American Association of Retired People) will continue to be the dominant driver in US politics. ...joy.
(update: Thanks to Matt's comment which points out there IS an AAYP.)
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
NOAA says we can't change the climate for 1000 years
We are not capable of maintaining a static world. I would argue this point for several subject which are encompassed by our world...but today will be for the popular Climate Change condition(s).
According to this article, Climate Change (and the conditions expected to arise because of it) is here to stay for at least 1000 years even if 100% (that's all for you home gamers out there) of the CO2 emissions from mankind are ceased today. NOAA is the predominant authority on weather and climate thanks in part to a large number of satellites they have in orbit and their long time weather stations across the world.
Last week, a new satellite, though not from NOAA, was launched to take a new high-tech look at some key elements and conditions for our upper atmosphere. The initial results for that won't be out for at least a few months.
So what does this mean? You can be sure it means little or nothing to those who benefit emotionally, socially, politically, or financially from the greatest fear ever proclaimed. When considering the relative solidarity world leaders have demonstrated when addressing the issue of climate change and the sense of urgency we have been urged to share over the past several years, one should take this opportunity to consider an alternative: We are powerless to maintain a static world.
With so much time and effort dedicated to furthering the idea of humans as the Great Caretakers of The Earth including managing and taking responsibility for the (mass) extinction of plants, animals and even humans, the concept of hope to change the future has been the most powerful driving force for motivating people that the world may have ever seen. Consider also, please, people are generally self aggrandizing and arrogant with little true power on the cosmic level. I use the word "cosmic" in the context of space as it relates to Venus or the Sun or a supernova, not metaphysical or any other way.
It was previously known as Global Warming in the 90's and early 2000's. Before that, in the 60's & 70's the concept was known as Global Cooling. It seems that now, due to inconsistencies in the observations compared to the title (which inherently comes from the predictions) the term to settle on is "Climate Change". Guess what folks, change is coming and change is constant. The best and most consistent option we have observed for dealing with these, and indeed all changes, is adaptation and evolution.
Humans have taken developmental adaptation and evolution to the intellectual and communication levels which puts us in a much better position to work through these changes. Remember, if you don't believe in change, you don't believe in General Relativity and the concept of a finite universe.
Lest I continue on an unreadable rant I shall now conclude by saying:
The progress of mankind is regularly hindered throughout history by staggeringly misdirected focuses of urgency and effort which have often resulted in unexpected advancement achieved by correcting massive mistakes (No, Chris Columbus, there isn't a new route to Asia...just the Americas. Thanks for that anyway. We got something out of your journey.). Some good will come of human-kind's attempts at ruling over the natural world and even the Earth itself but I am more eager to embrace the idea that much greater advances could be made if there was not so much misdirected energy dedicated to controlling the sky and oceans. If we continue with the time honored tradition of having "dominion over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth" we will eventually find a movement to try improving and protecting the Sun and the orbit of the planets because those things directly affect Earth. The proposal of such a movement is not as absurd a concept as I would like it to be.
According to this article, Climate Change (and the conditions expected to arise because of it) is here to stay for at least 1000 years even if 100% (that's all for you home gamers out there) of the CO2 emissions from mankind are ceased today. NOAA is the predominant authority on weather and climate thanks in part to a large number of satellites they have in orbit and their long time weather stations across the world.
Last week, a new satellite, though not from NOAA, was launched to take a new high-tech look at some key elements and conditions for our upper atmosphere. The initial results for that won't be out for at least a few months.
So what does this mean? You can be sure it means little or nothing to those who benefit emotionally, socially, politically, or financially from the greatest fear ever proclaimed. When considering the relative solidarity world leaders have demonstrated when addressing the issue of climate change and the sense of urgency we have been urged to share over the past several years, one should take this opportunity to consider an alternative: We are powerless to maintain a static world.
With so much time and effort dedicated to furthering the idea of humans as the Great Caretakers of The Earth including managing and taking responsibility for the (mass) extinction of plants, animals and even humans, the concept of hope to change the future has been the most powerful driving force for motivating people that the world may have ever seen. Consider also, please, people are generally self aggrandizing and arrogant with little true power on the cosmic level. I use the word "cosmic" in the context of space as it relates to Venus or the Sun or a supernova, not metaphysical or any other way.
It was previously known as Global Warming in the 90's and early 2000's. Before that, in the 60's & 70's the concept was known as Global Cooling. It seems that now, due to inconsistencies in the observations compared to the title (which inherently comes from the predictions) the term to settle on is "Climate Change". Guess what folks, change is coming and change is constant. The best and most consistent option we have observed for dealing with these, and indeed all changes, is adaptation and evolution.
Humans have taken developmental adaptation and evolution to the intellectual and communication levels which puts us in a much better position to work through these changes. Remember, if you don't believe in change, you don't believe in General Relativity and the concept of a finite universe.
Lest I continue on an unreadable rant I shall now conclude by saying:
The progress of mankind is regularly hindered throughout history by staggeringly misdirected focuses of urgency and effort which have often resulted in unexpected advancement achieved by correcting massive mistakes (No, Chris Columbus, there isn't a new route to Asia...just the Americas. Thanks for that anyway. We got something out of your journey.). Some good will come of human-kind's attempts at ruling over the natural world and even the Earth itself but I am more eager to embrace the idea that much greater advances could be made if there was not so much misdirected energy dedicated to controlling the sky and oceans. If we continue with the time honored tradition of having "dominion over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth" we will eventually find a movement to try improving and protecting the Sun and the orbit of the planets because those things directly affect Earth. The proposal of such a movement is not as absurd a concept as I would like it to be.
Monday, January 12, 2009
Wireless Charger for Electronics
Here's a short presentation of a cool technology that gets us that much closer to being totally wireless. It'll be on sale at the end of 2009 for less than $100. Wild stuff!
Friday, January 2, 2009
Thomas Jefferson Quotes
To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.
Thomas Jefferson - 1802
It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.
Thomas Jefferson
When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe.
Thomas Jefferson
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.
Thomas Jefferson
I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
Thomas Jefferson
My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.
Thomas Jefferson
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
Thomas Jefferson
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
Thomas Jefferson
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Jefferson
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.
Thomas Jefferson - 1802
It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.
Thomas Jefferson
When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe.
Thomas Jefferson
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.
Thomas Jefferson
I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
Thomas Jefferson
My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.
Thomas Jefferson
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
Thomas Jefferson
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
Thomas Jefferson
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)